Should Trump Cancel the G-20 Meeting with Putin?

Recent events have raised questions about the US policy towards Russia and the upcoming G-20 meeting between Trump and Putin. This article delves into the complexities of diplomatic relationships and the potential implications of canceling such a meeting.

The Implications of US Policy

It is increasingly evident that the current US policy towards Russia is not just floundering but entirely absent. The very idea of meeting with other leaders should be based on something more significant than mere force or demands. Historically, diplomacy has been based on compromise and mutual interests, not coercion.

The Role of the Deep State

Underlying the frosty relationship between the US and Russia is a deep-seated enmity. The so-called 'Russian narrative' within the US deep state seeks to prevent any form of cooperation or mutual understanding between the two countries. This narrative suggests that any attempts at dialogue are nothing more than a sham.

Questioning the Meaning of US Elections

The ongoing debate over the 'Russia gate' and the behavior of current and former US presidents highlight the underlying tensions within the political system. If a president's actions are dictated more by a perceived necessity to 'behave' according to this narrative than by genuine policy decisions, then the very essence of the democratic process is jeopardized.

Trump's Diplomatic Engagement

If Trump were to actually meet with Putin, the corporate media would no doubt go into overdrive, labeling him as a 'traitor' for any perceived collusions. However, it's worth noting that Trump had previously criticized the Obama administration for being too weak towards Russia over the annexation of Crimea. In this light, his wimpy response to confronting Putin on the latest developments with Ukraine could be seen as a reflection of consistent behavior rather than a sudden change in stance.

The incident in question—Russian harassment of Ukrainian shipping—is likely a false flag operation orchestrated by Ukrainian President Poroshenko. This action is aimed at bolstering Poroshenko's legitimacy in a presidential election, where he is facing significant challenges without external support from the US. Additionally, Trump's continued silence on Poroshenko's actions, despite meeting with him, reflects a nuanced and strategic position, rather than a lack of support.

Putin's Perspective

From Putin's perspective, the G-20 meeting may seem redundant given Trump's lack of decisive influence over international affairs. Putin might even consider canceling the meeting, as it serves no practical purpose given Trump's largely symbolic role on the world stage.

Conclusion

The decision on whether to cancel the G-20 meeting with Putin lies more with Putin than with Trump. While Trump's lack of influence is evident, it is ultimately Putin who needs to consider the strategic value of such a meeting in light of current international dynamics. Whether such meetings can contribute to meaningful dialogue and cooperation remains a question that hangs heavily over the world of diplomacy.