Presidential Candidates Health: Transparency and Rumors
Presidential Candidates' Health: Transparency and Rumors
Presidential candidates undertake a range of public duties that require robust health and mental wellbeing. However, is it mandatory for them to undergo a physical exam before becoming a candidate? This article delves into the absence of such requirements and the prevalence of health-related rumors surrounding candidates like Biden and Trump.
Are Physical Exams for Presidential Candidates Mandatory?
There is no direct provision for a physical exam or the disclosure of results for presidential candidates. This may lead to concerns, especially regarding the health of candidates who are older and have a significant public presence. A physical exam can serve as a reassurance for the public, helping to address their concerns about the candidate’s health.
Historical Precedents: Health Information and Obfuscation
Examining historical precedents can provide insights into how candidates handle their health information. For instance, in 1968, while running for president, Hubert Humphrey was mentioned to have a small spot on his lung. This spot was described as "smaller than a pencil point dot." While the spot was indeed real, it led to his death from lung cancer much later. The campaign team propagated a sanitized version of Humphrey's health, similar to how Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy managed their respective health facts.
Similarly, the health of Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden has been subjects of speculation. Trump's minor stroke and Biden's potential dementia are topics of heated discussion. The Candidacies of both men being in their seventies, and the average lifespan for American men being 78.6 years, heightens these concerns. During their campaigns, only selected facts were made public, with more sensitive details kept private. This raises questions about the authenticity of the information provided and the potential manipulation of public perceptions.
Why an Independent Health Assessment is Crucial
Given the importance of a candidate’s health and state of mind, it is reasonable to advocate for an independent health assessment. Candidates like Trump and Biden, who are in their seventies, should undergo a comprehensive evaluation by an independent panel. This could be conducted at a reputable institution such as the Mayo Clinic, known for its excellence in medical care. An official health report would help quell public doubts and ensure that the candidate's fitness to serve is beyond reproach.
The debate over transparency extends to health evaluations. Candidates are typically selective in the information they share with the public, focusing on their strengths while downplaying any vulnerabilities. For instance, Trump has not released his tax returns after four years, suggesting a reluctance to disclose personal financial information, let alone health data. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the authenticity of the health information that is made public.
Addressing Rumors: The Role of Health Exams
The health of both Trump and Biden remains a topic of debate. Given their advanced age, it is reasonable to question whether they have any underlying health issues. Dementia and minor strokes are common among older individuals, especially those in positions of public service. While no one can definitively state that a candidate does or does not have certain health issues, an independent health examination can provide clarity and reassurance to the public.
A formal assessment would help dispel rumors and provide concrete evidence of a candidate's fitness for the role. For example, Dr. Vinnie Boom-Bah’s over-the-top claim that Trump was the healthiest man ever to run for president is contradicted by visible signs of poor health, such as his diet and physical condition. An independent panel would provide an objective evaluation, free from political bias.
Personal Observations and Conclusion
I have known the Bidens as a family since 2008, and my interactions with them have provided a unique perspective. Joe Biden, 77 years old, has indeed slowed down since 2008 but remains mentally sharp. While there are concerns about his age, he is undoubtedly more capable and sane than his opponent. A comprehensive health report could further support this assessment and provide peace of mind to the American public.
In conclusion, while there is no mandatory requirement for health exams, advocating for one would be a reasonable step to ensure that the candidates are in the best possible condition to serve the public. Health is a vital aspect of leadership, and an independent assessment would help address public concerns and maintain trust in the electoral process.