Is Sexism a Justifiable Game of Seduction and Dominance?

Sexism, a concept that often brings about controversy and debate, is a complex issue that can be viewed from multiple angles. While some argue that being sexist is nothing wrong as long as both sexes are allowed to use it, others see it as a harmful and unjustifiable practice that needs to be eradicated. In this article, we explore the arguments for and against sexism, particularly focusing on the idea that it is simply a game of seduction and dominance.

The roots of sexism: Cultural perspectives

It's important to understand that the concept of sexism is deeply rooted in cultural beliefs and practices. What is considered fair or just in one culture may not be the same in another, which can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. The author argues that whether sexism is wrong depends on the culture in which an individual was raised. In some parts of the world, certain practices may be tolerated or even expected, while in others, they are immediately condemned.

Is sexism just a game of seduction and dominance?

The author suggests that sexism can be seen as a game of seduction and dominance, where both men and women can participate and enjoy. This view implies that sexism is not necessarily a negative or harmful practice, but rather a part of human interaction that can be both enjoyable and powerful. However, the article also points out that with the rise of progressive feminism, a small group of individuals has decided that anyone who enjoys or participates in sexism is morally wrong, which has led to attempts to censor such behavior.

The root of sexism: DNA and social norms

The author contends that the roots of sexism are not in society but in our DNA, making it a fundamental part of human nature. Just as freedom is an innate desire, so is the desire for dominance and control over others. The author uses the analogy of Orwellian tactics, suggesting that attempting to wipe out sexism through censorship is akin to trying to outlaw freedom entirely. Even if such measures are implemented, people will still find ways to express their desires and dominate others, whether at home, with friends, or in other settings.

The implications of censorship

The article discusses the futility of attempting to censor any form of behavior, whether it be sexism, racism, or any other issue. When people feel their freedoms are being restricted, as was seen with the recent election results, they are more likely to rebel. The author cites Monty Python's "Life of Brian" as an example of how attempts to censor behavior often backfire, leading to increased resistance rather than compliance.

The power of human nature

Another key argument in the article is that human nature itself is a major obstacle to eradicating sexism. The author points out that in times of war or severe hardship, food and survival take precedence over concerns of sexism. However, when life is easier, people have more time to consider and act on their desires, including those related to dominance and control. The strong drive for freedom and expression is presented as a fundamental human trait that cannot be easily suppressed.

In conclusion, the article challenges readers to consider whether sexism is a justifiable game of seduction and dominance, or an unsolvable issue rooted in human DNA and social norms. The author suggests that while it may be difficult to eradicate, attempting to censor such behavior is not the solution, as it only leads to increased resistance and rebellion.