AK-47 vs New AKs: Reliability in Modern Warfare

When discussing the reliability of firearms, especially in the context of modern warfare, two names often come up: the AK-47 and the new AKs. Both are renowned for their durability and performance in often challenging conditions. However, there is a common belief that the new AKs are less reliable compared to the original AK-47. In this article, we delve into the mechanics and reliability of these firearms, exploring whether the newer versions indeed measure up to their predecessors.

Are the New AKs Reliable Like the AK-47?

The reliability of any firearm is a complex matter, dependent on numerous factors such as the condition of the gun, the environment it operates in, and the ammunition used. The core components of a firearm, including magazines and barrels, play significant roles in determining its performance and lifespan.

Design and Construction

One of the primary concerns with modern AKs is their design and construction. Unlike AK-47s, which are built with more robust materials and are less prone to debris and dirt, new AKs use thinner barrel designs that can overheat and melt faster. The construction is often described as being made of sheet metal and pine wood, which makes them more vulnerable to the elements. Additionally, the receiver design on the newer models is more open, allowing dirt, mud, and debris to easily enter the mechanism, potentially jamming the gun.

Magazines and Reliability

Magazines are often cited as the backbone of a firearm's reliability. The steel Comblock 'banana clips' of older AKs are recognized for their strength and durability, rarely breaking or jamming. However, modern AR magazines are almost as reliable as AK mags, albeit less durable and lighter in weight. Both types of magazines ensure that the rifle can function consistently, providing a benchmark for reliable performance.

Comparing Reliability: AK-47 vs M16

The reliability of the AK-47 is often compared to that of the M16, another legendary firearm. While the M16 enjoys tighter tolerances and a more enclosed design that repels dirt and debris more effectively, the AK-47’s looser tolerances make it more forgiving in dusty and mud-filled environments. This means that a bit of dirt or debris in the action is less likely to jam the AK-47 compared to a more precise system like the M16.

Field Conditions and Maintenance

The real test of a firearm’s reliability lies in its ability to function under field conditions. AK-47s are generally more tolerant of neglect and require less cleaning and maintenance. They don’t need as much oiling, making them easier to handle in harsh environments. On the other hand, M16s with their tighter tolerances demand regular maintenance to ensure they stay clean and functional. Dropped in the mud, an AK-47 is more likely to take dirt and debris into its mechanism, but it can continue to operate for a longer time without cleaning.

M16s, however, benefit from their closed system and tight tolerances, making it harder for dirt and debris to enter the action. While this ensures fewer issues in the short term, it also means that even minor debris can cause significant malfunctions if it does get in. Therefore, soldiers with M16s need to maintain their rifles regularly to avoid issues, while AK-47 users can often operate with less maintenance, albeit with a higher risk of debris entering the mechanism.

Historical Context and the Vietnam War

During the Vietnam War, the M16 was often highlighted for its reliability issues, leading to the myth that the AK-47 is more reliable. However, the true cause of these reliability issues was a combination of factors, including the wrong ammunition and inadequate maintenance kits. The military switched the gun powder to a type that was already in stock, but this powder was not suitable for the M16's direct impingement system. This led to excessive backpressure and powder residue, causing jams and malfunctions.

Moreover, the elimination of cleaning kits further exacerbated these issues, as soldiers could not properly maintain their M16s. The belief that these issues were due to the firearm itself was a misconception. The AK-47, with its looser tolerances, actually had fewer issues with the same ammunition and maintenance conditions. This fact undermines the common belief that the AK-47 is inherently more reliable than the M16.

Understanding the context and mechanics of these firearms is crucial for evaluating their reliability in different scenarios. While the AK-47 may be more forgiving in neglect and dirt, the M16’s tighter tolerances ensure fewer issues in optimal conditions. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific operational environment and the level of maintenance available to the user.